咁如果10分代表絕對繁榮,0分代表絕對不繁榮,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a prosperous society, with 10 indicating absolutely prosperous, 0 indicating absolutely not prosperous, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (per poll) /
如果10分代表十分繁榮,0分代表完全唔繁榮,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a prosperous society, with 10 indicating very prosperous, 0 indicating not prosperous at all, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (per poll)

調查日期
Date of survey
繁榮程度評價
Appraisal of Degree of Prosperity
標準誤差
Standard Error
樣本人數
Total Sample
次樣本人數
Sub Sample
評分人數
Number of Raters
認知率
Recognition Rate
16-19/9/2019 5.87 0.09 1061 654 645 98.6%
6-9/5/2019 6.55 0.08 1018 580 575 99.2%
22-24/10/2018@ 6.61 0.08 1006 554 546 98.6%
4-9/5/2018 7.21 0.06 1017 1017 1010 99.3%
15-18/1/2018 6.93 0.08 1035 631 622 98.5%
10-13/7/2017* 7.04 0.08 1030 574 571 99.4%
6-9/02/2017 6.63 0.07 1029 666 655 98.3%
18-21/7/2016 6.46 0.08 1013 544 539 99.1%
15-18/2/2016 6.45 0.08 1026 594 584 98.3%
20-23/7/2015 6.66 0.07 1010 585 579 98.9%
9-12/2/2015 6.82 0.07 1019 663 656 99.0%
21-24/7/2014 6.87 0.07 1017 630 620 98.5%
7-12/2/2014 7.02 0.07 1031 558 549 98.3%
30/7-1/8/2013 6.96 0.07 1027 673 664 98.6%
4-14/2/2013 6.91 0.08 1023 592 580 98.1%
7-15/8/2012 7.12 0.08 1040 540 530 98.1%
13-16/2/2012 7.01 0.08 1007 571 557 97.6%
15-19/8/2011 7.02 0.07 1005 609 603 99.0%
9-17/2/2011 6.98 0.08 1035 550 542 98.5%
10-13/8/2010 7.09 0.05 1007 1007 997 99.0%
4-9/2/2010 7.03 0.06 1060 1060 1052 99.3%
11-16/8/2009 6.88 0.05 1006 1006 1002 99.6%
10-12/2/2009 6.82 0.06 1011 1011 1001 99.0%
11-14/8/2008 7.02 0.06 1016 1016 998 98.2%
12-14/2/2008 7.28 0.05 1028 1028 990 96.3%
20-24/8/2007 7.06 0.05 1010 1010 989 97.9%
22-26/2/2007 7.02 0.05 1014 1014 997 98.3%
21-23/8/2006 6.80 0.06 1019 1019 1006 98.7%
17-21/2/2006 6.94 0.05 1017 1017 1006 98.9%
25-29/10/2005 6.80 0.05 1017 1017 998 98.2%
18-20/7/2005 6.77 0.06 1008 1008 984 97.6%
18-21/4/2005 6.74 0.05 1012 1012 991 97.9%
17-19/1/2005 6.60 0.06 1022 1022 997 97.6%
18-21/10/2004 6.29 0.06 1011 1011 984 97.3%
19-21/7/2004 6.48 0.06 1031 1031 1006 97.6%
19-22/4/2004 6.06 0.06 1029 1029 1002 97.4%
9-12/1/2004 6.29 0.06 1026 1026 1010 98.4%
19-22/10/2003 5.78 0.06 1017 1017 977 96.1%
14-16/7/2003 5.18 0.06 1073 1073 1036 96.6%
16-23/4/2003 5.33 0.06 1021 1021 959 93.9%
20-23/1/2003 5.72 0.06 1049 1049 999 95.2%
13-16/10/2002 5.70 0.06 1028 1028 959 93.3%
2-3/7/2002 5.53 0.06 1068 1068 963 90.2%
2-8/4/2002 5.88 0.06 1017 1017 930 91.4%
2-6/1/2002 5.61 0.06 1046 1046 984 94.1%
5-8/10/2001 5.52 0.07 1051 1051 976 92.9%
3-9/7/2001 5.75 0.06 1051 1051 989 94.1%
18-30/4/2001 6.02 0.06 1082 1082 1017 94.0%
17-19/1/2001 5.98 0.06 1046 1046 1002 95.8%
3-9/10/2000 6.17 0.06 1067 1067 972 91.1%
6-10/7/2000 5.79 0.06 1058 1058 994 94.0%
5-18/5/2000 6.42 0.06 1060 1060 1031 97.3%
1/3/2000 6.61 0.08 517 517 501 96.9%
11-12/1/2000 6.35 0.08 519 519 503 96.9%
4/1/2000 6.63 0.09 535 535 520 97.2%
1-2/11/1999 6.19 0.08 543 543 525 96.7%
10-13/9/1999 5.84 0.08 576 576 561 97.4%
5/7/1999 6.13 0.08 527 527 516 97.9%
4/5/1999 6.18 0.08 536 536 522 97.4%
2/3/1999 6.21 0.09 510 510 502 98.4%
5/1/1999 5.99 0.08 544 544 528 97.1%
4-5/11/1998 6.57 0.08 511 511 503 98.4%
1/9/1998 5.94 0.08 507 507 488 96.3%
7/7/1998 6.23 0.09 532 532 514 96.6%
5/5/1998 5.70 0.09 542 542 515 95.0%
2/3/1998 6.49 0.08 527 527 506 96.0%
6/1/1998 6.62 0.08 520 520 499 96.0%
4-5/11/1997 6.96 0.08 523 523 501 95.8%
28-29/10/1997 7.42 0.07 536 536 516 96.3%
23-24/9/1997 7.89 0.06 511 511 497 97.3%
26-27/8/1997 7.86 0.06 532 532 513 96.4%
29-30/7/1997 7.86 0.07 564 564 540 95.7%
6/25/1997 8.05 0.06 548 548 526 96.0%

* 該調查結果公佈時尚未包括手機樣本。上表結果已更新為固網樣本及手機樣本的合併統計數字。
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.
@ 約一半樣本的字眼為「絕對繁榮/絕對不繁榮」,另外一半樣本則為「十分繁榮/完全唔繁榮」。
@ The wordings in half of the sample were “absolutely prosperous / absolutely not prosperous”, while those in the other half were “very prosperous/ not prosperous at all”.