咁如果10分代表絕對民主,0分代表絕對不民主,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a democratic society, with 10 indicating absolutely democratic, 0 indicating absolutely not democratic, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (per poll) /
如果10分代表十分民主,0分代表完全唔民主,5分代表一半半,你會比幾多分香港社會? (按次計算)
If you were to use 0-10 to evaluate whether Hong Kong is a democratic society, with 10 indicating very democratic, 0 indicating not democratic at all, 5 indicating half-half, how would you rate Hong Kong? (per poll)

調查日期
Date of survey
民主程度評價
Appraisal of Degree of Democracy
標準誤差
Standard Error
樣本人數
Total Sample
次樣本人數
Sub Sample
評分人數
Number of Raters
認知率
Recognition Rate
16-19/9/2019 4.55 0.13 1061 609 590 96.8%
6-9/5/2019 5.42 0.10 1018 615 607 98.7%
22-24/10/2018@ 5.10 0.11 1006 534 512 95.9%
4-9/5/2018 5.65 0.08 1017 1017 1003 98.7%
15-18/1/2018 5.74 0.10 1035 640 622 97.2%
10-13/7/2017* 6.32 0.10 1030 635 623 98.2%
6-9/02/2017 6.02 0.10 1029 611 606 99.1%
18-21/7/2016 5.86 0.10 1013 562 542 96.5%
15-18/2/2016 5.89 0.10 1026 623 607 97.5%
20-23/7/2015 6.05 0.10 1010 574 554 96.5%
9-12/2/2015 6.11 0.10 1019 617 609 98.6%
21-24/7/2014 5.93 0.09 1017 663 642 96.9%
7-12/2/2014 6.25 0.10 1031 564 557 98.6%
30/7-1/8/2013 6.28 0.09 1027 611 602 98.7%
4-14/2/2013 6.33 0.08 1023 698 686 98.3%
7-15/8/2012 6.38 0.09 1040 552 541 98.0%
13-16/2/2012 6.44 0.08 1007 581 570 98.1%
15-19/8/2011 6.55 0.08 1005 660 644 97.6%
9-17/2/2011 6.39 0.09 1035 532 528 99.1%
10-13/8/2010 6.57 0.06 1007 1007 998 99.1%
4-9/2/2010 5.99 0.06 1060 1060 1043 98.4%
11-16/8/2009 6.02 0.06 1006 1006 998 99.2%
10-12/2/2009 6.11 0.06 1011 1011 998 98.7%
11-14/8/2008 6.10 0.07 1016 1016 997 98.1%
12-14/2/2008 6.25 0.06 1028 1028 989 96.2%
20-24/8/2007 6.25 0.06 1010 1010 985 97.6%
22-26/2/2007 6.08 0.06 1014 1014 995 98.1%
21-23/8/2006 6.20 0.06 1019 1019 991 97.3%
17-21/2/2006 6.29 0.06 1017 1017 990 97.4%
25-29/10/2005 6.29 0.06 1017 1017 980 96.3%
18-20/7/2005 6.14 0.06 1008 1008 973 96.5%
18-21/4/2005 6.27 0.05 1012 1012 975 96.3%
17-19/1/2005 6.08 0.06 1022 1022 983 96.2%
18-21/10/2004 6.02 0.06 1011 1011 967 95.6%
19-21/7/2004 5.97 0.06 1031 1031 992 96.2%
19-22/4/2004 5.63 0.06 1029 1029 983 95.5%
9-12/1/2004 5.79 0.06 1026 1026 980 95.5%
19-22/10/2003 5.90 0.06 1017 1017 954 93.8%
14-16/7/2003 5.59 0.06 1073 1073 1025 95.5%
16-23/4/2003 6.09 0.06 1021 1021 941 92.2%
20-23/1/2003 6.16 0.06 1049 1049 987 94.1%
13-16/10/2002 6.06 0.06 1028 1028 954 92.8%
2-3/7/2002 6.11 0.06 1068 1068 964 90.3%
2-8/4/2002 6.31 0.07 1017 1017 915 90.0%
2-6/1/2002 6.03 0.06 1046 1046 973 93.0%
5-8/10/2001 6.09 0.06 1051 1051 971 92.4%
3-9/7/2001 5.97 0.06 1051 1051 965 91.8%
18-30/4/2001 6.19 0.06 1082 1082 1015 93.8%
17-19/1/2001 5.88 0.06 1046 1046 979 93.6%
3-9/10/2000 5.83 0.06 1067 1067 965 90.4%
6-10/7/2000 5.76 0.06 1058 1058 968 91.5%
5-18/5/2000 6.11 0.06 1060 1060 999 94.2%
1/3/2000 6.14 0.09 517 517 496 95.9%
11-12/1/2000 5.82 0.08 519 519 502 96.7%
4/1/2000 6.00 0.08 535 535 507 94.8%
1-2/11/1999 5.88 0.08 543 543 518 95.4%
10-13/9/1999 5.88 0.08 576 576 555 96.4%
5/7/1999 5.84 0.09 527 527 513 97.3%
4/5/1999 6.28 0.08 536 536 521 97.2%
2/3/1999 6.45 0.08 510 510 495 97.1%
5/1/1999 6.23 0.08 544 544 528 97.1%
4-5/11/1998 6.29 0.07 511 511 490 95.9%
1/9/1998 6.38 0.08 507 507 487 96.1%
7/7/1998 6.29 0.08 532 532 500 94.0%
5/5/1998 6.14 0.09 542 542 502 92.6%
2/3/1998 6.15 0.07 527 527 500 94.9%
6/1/1998 5.90 0.08 520 520 486 93.5%
4-5/11/1997 5.87 0.08 523 523 469 89.7%
28-29/10/1997 6.19 0.07 536 536 517 96.5%
23-24/9/1997 6.28 0.07 511 511 489 95.7%
26-27/8/1997 6.34 0.07 532 532 502 94.4%
29-30/7/1997 6.20 0.08 564 564 520 92.2%
6/25/1997 6.70 0.08 548 548 503 91.8%

* 該調查結果公佈時尚未包括手機樣本。上表結果已更新為固網樣本及手機樣本的合併統計數字。
* The mobile sample was not included when survey results were released. The figures in the table above have been updated to reflect the results based on the combined landline and mobile sample.
@ 約一半樣本的字眼為「絕對民主/絕對不民主」,另外一半樣本則為「十分民主/完全唔民主」。
@ The wordings in half of the sample were “absolutely democratic / absolutely not democratic”, while those in the other half were “very democratic / not democratic at all”.